Legal Case: Differing Interpretations of Radio-Opacities...at Trial

In both dentistry and medicine, reading radiographs is an aspect of diagnosis that’s susceptible to subjective judgment. Different interpretations of radiographs can result in various treatment plans that ultimately affect patient care. When radiographs are used as evidence in a dental malpractice trial, these differing opinions can result in numerous implications for the evidence and a potential misunderstanding of the facts. This podcast highlights a case that illustrates how this can happen; and is based on an article provided by MedPro Group, the nation’s leading dental malpractice insurance carrier.